Friday, December 21, 2007

The New Face of Poverty is Fat


Wisebread.com- Twenty years ago, I parked at a supermarket, near where a poor family had just parked. I knew they were poor, because they looked like poor folks are supposed to look: Their clothes were worn (but mended and clean). Their car was an aging sedan. They were recycling a trunkful of aluminum cans. As I locked my car, they took the handful of change they got for the cans, and headed in ahead of me. There were three of them--man, woman, child--and all three were skinny. It's unusual to see that now. The new face of poverty is fat.

Poor people being skinny was already getting to be unusual twenty years ago, or I probably wouldn't remember it so vividly. Now, the fat person going to the food bank is a cliche.

I've thought about it a lot in the years since then. How can poor people be fat?

I've read a lot about the topic, and there are a lot of answers. Some focus on the food (healthy food is expensive, empty calories are cheap). More focus on the people (poor people are stupid, poor people are ignorant about good nutrition, poor people are lazy, poor people are too busy working two jobs to get enough exercise, poor people are too tired after working two jobs to get enough exercise, poor people don't have access to fitness centers, poor people don't have access to kitchens, poor neighborhoods have lots of fast-food restaurants and few farmers markets).

I think the answer, though, comes down to hunger.

Hunger is a powerful force--powerful enough to make a question like "If a hungry man steals a loaf of bread to feed his family, is it really theft?" a genuine ethical conundrum. Hungry people will do almost anything to get food--and for people with hungry children, you can delete the "almost."

The feeling of "hunger" is constructed in your brain based on many different inputs. A lot of research has gone into understanding what makes people feel hunger. (Particularly from drug companies who could make a fortune from a diet drug that worked, but also other kinds of scientists.) It turns out, though, that hunger is deeply wired into the human brain--it doesn't just depend on getting enough calories. Among other things, it depends on getting all the important nutrients, although it's not as simple as just that either.

If you're poor and hungry, you buy the cheapest calories you can find. If you eat that stuff until you no longer feel hungry, you're eating too many calories. That's why poor people are fat.

It's especially sad, because it actually is possible to eat a good, healthy diet pretty cheaply. Unfortunately, it's not cheap and easy--it's really quite complex. You have to know about nutrition. You have to have the use of a kitchen, and time to cook. You have to have access to fresh vegetables.

There are a number of good articles on the topic here on Wise Bread, starting with Sarah's recent Healthy eating--it'll cost you, Andrea's Why is it so expensive to be healthy, and Tannaz's Save the world and save a dime: eat locally. Be sure to look at some of the great articles Myscha has written on cheap, healthy eating. I've written two: Eating locally on a budget and Healthy recipes with cost data.

The way to get cheap and healthy together is to eat real food without worrying about whether it's organic or local or not. You can get better vegis at the farmers market or from community supported agriculture--but whatever vegis are cheap in the produce department at the grocery store will still be better than some packaged food product full of partially hydrogenated soybean oil and high fructose corn syrup.

It's the real food that's the key. Ninety percent of what you bring home from the grocery store shouldn't have an ingredients list--it should be ingredients. Food has gotten more expensive, but rice and beans are still cheap. Only in America do the truly poor eat meat twice a day--but even meat is still cheap, if you buy what's on sale. Again, it won't be as good or as healthy as meat from animals that were locally raised in a humane fashion, but it will be both healthier and cheaper than eating at a fast-food restaurant.

Once you're eating real food, trying to source more of it locally will get you better food--and food that is sometimes cheaper and often almost as cheap. Check out the Eat Local Challenge for lots of information about eating local food cheaply.

Of course, the people reading this know all that. I don't know how to get the word out to the people who don't. But I do know that you can be hungry and fat. If you're poor in today's world, it's very nearly automatic.

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

5 Life Lessons from Fight Club


Fight Club starring Brad Pitt and Ed Norton (which was first a book by Chuck Palahniuk, almost the full book here), should be required viewing for all Americans. This movie is genius.

If you havn't seen it (you should) the story line exists in a confusing world poised on the brink of mayhem, where Tyler Durden (Brad Pitt), a projectionist, waiter, and anarchic genius, comes up with an idea to create clubs in which young men can escape their humdrum existence and prove themselves in barehanded fights. The movie is full of stuff that we can take away to use in our lives...

"You are not your job. You are not how much money you have in the bank. You are not the car you drive. Reject the importance of material possessions. "

Like Tyler Durden says, "We are consumers. We're the bi-products of a lifestyle obsession." In this life, especially in the US, so many people think your life is what you own, you have to have stuff to be important, screw that. Take it from the people in New Orleans, "stuff" can be gone in a second.

American corporations have brainwashed us to think this (which is a great marketing strategy because they make more money if we do), and most Americans are too dumb to see that they are mindless consumers, buying things they don't need and spending money they don't have (hence the mortgage/debt crisis that is slowly wrecking our economy) . To be truly happy you don't buy more stuff, you build what people or nature can't take away from you, like knowledge, memories and inner strength.

"This is your life and it's ending one minute at a time."

Life is short, planning and acting for the future is important, but living for today is the most important. Don't spend your whole life saying, "I'm gonna kill myself working today and not have any fun in a dead end job so I can make a little money and so I can enjoy tomorrow.." Because chances are, you'll die tomorrow.

"Only after disaster can we be resurrected."

Without pain, without sacrifice there would not be good times in life. You have to have seen dark to have the light. Only after pain can we know the true good times. It's like breaking a bone, if it heals correctly in comes back stronger. That is how the soul works too. Sure there may be a scar, but you are stronger for it. Inner strength is a beautiful thing.

"You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake. You're the same decaying organic matter as everything else."

For all you cocky bastards out there, what made you special? We all came from the same place and we are going back to the same the same dirt. What makes you special? Oh, you made some money last year and you drive a fast car? Congratulations, get in line. Somebody will always be better than you in life, get over yourself.

"Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken."

To all the pretenders and liars who fake it, just because you talk to the talk doesn't mean you are successful. All these people buying things to make themselves seem important are just sticking feathers up there butt. You are the condition of your soul, not the materials you own. To be successful is not to live in a 6,000 sqft home and drive a Bentley, its working everyday to do what you think is right and being happy doing it, that's success.

Why Nice Guys Suck

There's definitely a balance when you are in a relationship to when you let things slide off your back and when you should stand up for yourself (I guess this balance applies to life in general). I was a nice guy once, I used to just ignore all the bad things and let them slide by. Man, it makes you feel like a weenie. There's something liberating in just letting out your frustrations verbally or physically (as long as its not your girlfriend, wife, etc)..

I found this post on raigslist written by an angry girlfriend (not mine), its actually full of good stuff...

"So for the nice guys out there, my advice is this: It's great that you're nice (to an extent), but have some backbone. Don't be a spine donor all your life. When your girl is out of line, say something. Don't let her walk all over you. Occasionally, be a "bad" boy (being bad doesn't translate to abusive or criminal). Say "No" to her sometimes. Raise your voice and be heard. Say something dirty/sexy to her occasionally. Drink a few too many beers and piss out in public. Smack her ass. Don't ever use the word NICE to describe things, especially sex (okay, that may be a personal pet peeve). Have an interest in at LEAST one sport (or pretend to). Drive 5-10 miles over the speed limit once in awhile. Run an old lady off the road just for kicks (yeah, I'm kidding about this one... just ride her bumper for a few miles). Be aggressive during sex. Take off those damn white socks and Jesus sandals. Grow a goatee for a few weeks. Shave your balls. Stray from your routine and shake things up.

BE A MAN FOR GOD'S SAKE... and the women will fall at your feet."

Full article

Home construction drops to lowest level since '91


WASHINGTON — Housing construction fell in November and single-family activity dropped to the lowest level in more than 16 years as a severe housing slump showed no signs of a turnaround.

The Commerce Department reported that construction of new homes and apartments dropped by 3.7 percent last month to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.187 million units.

Construction of single-family homes fell by 5.5 percent to an annual rate of 829,000 units, the lowest level since April 1991, while multi-family construction was up 4.4 percent to an annual rate of 332,000 units.

In a bad sign for future activity, the government reported that applications for building permits fell for a sixth straight month, dropping by 1.5 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.15 million units, the slowest pace for building permits since June 1993.

The overall construction decline left home building 24.2 percent below the level of activity a year ago. Housing has been in a serious downturn for the past two years following five boom years in which sales and home prices soared.

The slump has raised concerns that the economy could be pushed into a full-blown recession. Starting this summer, some of the nation's largest banks and investment firms have declared multibillion-dollar losses stemming from a surge of defaults on subprime mortgages, loans offered to borrowers with weak credit histories.

Those defaults have resulted in a severe credit crunch as banks and other lenders have tightened up on their loan standards, making credit hard to come by for many businesses and consumers. The Federal Reserve, worried that the credit crunch will add to the economy's other problems, is searching for innovative ways to pump more money into the financial system, including two unprecedented auctions this week totalling $40 billion.

The overall economy is expected to slow to growth of 1 percent or less in the current quarter. A similarly weak growth rate is forecast for the first three months of next year รข€” the point of maximum danger, many economists believe, that the country could dip into recession.

The new housing report showed that construction activity was down in all regions of the country expect the South, which saw a small 0.3 percent rise. Construction plummeted 16.3 percent in the Northeast and fell 6.9 percent in the West and 1.5 percent in the Midwest.

The National Association of Home Builders reported Monday that its index of builder sentiment remained at a record low in December for a third straight month.

The index remained at 19, the lowest reading since this gauge of builder optimism was created in 1985. The index has been below 50 since May 2006. Index readngs above 50 indicate positive sentiment among builders about future sales.

Builders have been slashing construction plans and offering numerous incentives in an effort to reduce record levels of unsold homes.

The concern is that the rising number of mortgage defaults will dump even more homes on an already glutted market.

-ajc.com

Sunday, December 16, 2007

Dolphins Avoid Winless Season, Avoid Clinching 1st Round Draft Pick


The Miami Dolphins pulled through an OT victory on a 64 yard play after a Matt Stover missed 44 yard game winning field goal (he was 5 for 5 in game winners going into the kick). However, with the win, they miss clinching the number one draft pick in next years draft. Come on Miami, you can't do anything right.

The Dolphins owner Wayne Huizenga was crying at the end of the game, was it because the pressure of a winless season is now off his back or because it is pathetic how nuts Cleo Lemon and the Dolphins went when the game was over, or because he won't be able to pick up Darren McFadden or Glenn Dorsey next year with the number 1 pick? Don't worry Wayne, you'll get your number 1 pick, the Patriots will embarrass you and you can forget about even keeping it close at home with the Bengals. Better luck next year...

Friday, December 14, 2007

Barack Obama: My Pick for '08?

I have never voted anything except Republican in my short voting career. Time to break the trend?

Border Patrol Anyone? 67 Arrests in Mexican Drug Ring in Atlanta (Mostly Illegals)



If you know me, you know why I am posting this. But there is also another issue here. Can we get some border patrol please!!!


Atlanta 12/7/07- Federal authorities said Friday they shut down two major Mexico-based drug operations that were using Atlanta as a hub for trafficking marijuana, cocaine and methamphetamine up the East Coast.

By late Friday, 88 suspects had been indicted and criminal complaints filed, more charges were delayed until an indictment is returned against another 25.

Federal authorities said they seized drugs and cash totaling more than $27 million.

In a series of searches, authorities said, law enforcement officers from 300 agencies seized up to $10 million in cash meticulously packaged for shipment to Mexico; 111 kilograms of high-purity cocaine with markings that showed the drugs' origins; 17 pounds of 90 percent pure crystal methamphetamine, and 32 weapons.

U.S. Attorney David Nahmias said that by late Friday, 67 people were in custody, including members of the top tier of the organization in Atlanta, and officers were still executing arrest warrants. Nahmias said many of those arrested may have been in this country illegally.

Nahmias said the cartel's leaders in Mexico remain free.

"Somewhere in Mexico right now, there are some unhappy drug kingpins," Nahmias said....


Read the rest of the article here> ajc.com

Thursday, December 13, 2007

Would you fall all the way through a theoretical hole in the earth?


The simple answer is, theoretically, yes.

First, let us ignore friction, the rotation of the earth, and other complications, and focus on the case of a hole or tunnel entering the earth at one point, going straight through its center, and coming back to the surface at the opposite side of the planet. If we treat the mass distribution in the earth as uniform, one would fall into the tunnel and then come back up to the surface on the other side in a manner much like the motion of a pendulum swinging down and up again.

Assuming that the journey began with zero initial speed (simply dropping into the hole), your speed would increase and reach a maximum at the center of the earth, and then decrease until you reached the surface, at which point the speed would again be zero. The gravitational force exerted on the traveler would be proportional to his distance from the center of the earth: it's at a maximum at the surface and zero at the center. The total time required for this trip would be about 42 minutes. The speed of our traveler at the center of the Earth would be 7,900 meters a second. If there were no friction, there would be no energy loss so our traveler could oscillate into and out of the tunnel.

This trip could not take place in the real world for a number of reasons, including the implausibility of building a tunnel 12,756 kilometers long, displacing all of the material in the tunnel's proposed path, and having the tunnel go through both the earth's molten outer core and its inner core, where the temperature is about 6,000 degrees!

It would be much easier to build such a tunnel in a small asteroid. Interestingly enough, for a tunnel that reaches from one point to another point on the earth's surface but does not pass through the center of the planet, the travel time would still be about 42 minutes. The reason for this is that although the tunnel is shorter, the gravitational force along its path is also decreased as compared to that of a tunnel that goes through the center of the planet, which means you would travel more slowly. Because the distance and the component of gravity decrease by the same factor, the travel time ends up being the same.

-sciam.com

Fred Thompson misses Deleware Ballot


According to the Department of Elections, Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee have been certified to be on the Delaware primary ballot on Feb.5th.

Unfortunately, Fred Thompson fell short of the 500 signature mark, and will not be on the ballot.

The Delaware ballot for Feb 5th:

  • Rudy Giuliani
  • Mike Huckabee
  • John McCain
  • Ron Paul
  • Mitt Romney
  • Tom Tancredo

Others could be added in the near future should they decide to accept federal matching funds.

UPDATE: Jason Bonham at Race42008.com is reporting that the DOE said Thompson only had 281 out of 500 signatures, and that most of their signatures were rejected because they were not registered Republicans.

-firststatepolitics.wordpress.com

Global Warming: All 11 hottest years were in the last two decades

The 11 warmest years on record have all occurred in the last 13 years, with 2007 set to be the seventh hottest since 1950, according to provisional global data from the Met Office and the University of East Anglia.

The top eight hottest years since global records began are all this century, except the hottest of all, 1998, when the mean global temperature was 0.52 degrees Celsius above the long-term average for 1961-1990.

The announcement comes as the European Union clashed with the United States over Washington's resistance to setting global targets for fighting climate change at U.N. talks in Bali.

Scientists and politicians are in Indonesia to discuss how to reduce greenhouse gas emissions blamed for increasing global temperatures.

"The last few days have provided an important platform for debate and confirms the need for swift action to combat further rises in global temperatures because of human behaviour," Vicky Pope from the Met Office's Hadley Centre, who has been attending the conference, said in a statement on Thursday.

The last time annual mean global temperatures were below the long-term average was in 1985, the Hadley Centre, the leading climate research body, said on Thursday. Mean surface air temperatures have continued on an upward trend ever since.

According to global temperature data for January to November, 2007 is on track to be 0.41 degrees Celsius above the long-term average and would probably have been even hotter had it not been for the cooling effect of the La Nina weather phenomenon.

"The year began with a weak El Nino -- the warmer relation of La Nina -- and global temperatures well above the long-term average," Phil Jones, director of UEA's Climatic Research Unit, said. "However, since the end of April the La Nina event has taken some of the heat out of what could have been an even warmer year."

-http://www.christiantoday.com

Mitchell's List

Here is a list of most of the names of former and active Major League Baseball players named in the Mitchell Report on performance-enhancing drugs.

These names were based on incidents in the past, information from the BALCO investigation and original reporting by the Mitchell investigation including information from Kirk Radomski, a former Mets’ clubhouse attendant who pleaded guilty in April to steroid charges, Brian McNamee, a former trainer for Roger Clemens and Andy Pettitte, and from an investigation led by the Albany County district attorney into Signature Pharmacy.

As I review the report, names may be added to this list.

Chad Allen
Manny Alexander
Rick Ankiel
Mike Bell
David Bell
Gary Bennett Jr.
Marvin Benard
Larry Bigbie
Barry Bonds
Kevin Brown
Paul Byrd
Ken Caminiti
Jose Canseco
Mark Carreon
Jason Christiansen
Howie Clark
Roger Clemens
Jack Cust
Brendan Donnelly
Lenny Dykstra
Bobby Estalella
Matt Franco
Ryan Franklin
Eric Gagne
Jason Giambi
Jeremi Giambi
Jay Gibbons
Troy Glaus
Jason Grimsley
Jose Guillen
Jerry Hairston Jr.
Matt Herges
Phil Hiatt
Glenallen Hill
Darren Holmes
Todd Hundley
David Justice
Chuck Knoblauch
Tim Laker
Mike Lansing
Paul Lo Duca
Nook Logan
Josias Manzanillo
Gary Matthews Jr.
Cody McKay
Kent Mercker
Bart Miadich
Hal Morris
David Naulty
Denny Neagle
Jim Parque
Andy Pettitte
Adam Piatt
Todd Pratt
Stephen Randolph
Adam Riggs
Brian Roberts
John Rocker
F.P. Santangelo
Benito Santiago
Gary Sheffield
Scott Schoeneweis
David Segui
Mike Stanton
Miguel Tejada
Ismael Valdez
Mo Vaughn
Randy Velarde
Ron Villone
Fernando Vina
Rondell White
Todd Williams
Jeff Williams
Matt Williams
Steve Woodard
Kevin Young
Gregg Zaun


-New York Times

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

Life Lessons from Edison



Thomas Alva Edison was one of the most famous, successful and hard-working inventors in history. When he died in 1931 he held 1093 patents in his name. Some of his most used inventions were the light bulb and the gramophone.

Obviously Edison did not obtain over 1000 patents by luck, every successful man has some driving force of values behind him. Here are a few values from Edison that lead to his success.

“Many of life’s failures are people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up.”

One of the problems in life is that people just give up too soon. I think quite a big bit of this because of social programming and the expectations set by society. It’s seen as pretty normal to try once or maybe a few times and then give up.

“I have not failed. I’ve just found 10,000 ways that won’t work.”

Now, how do you reframe failure? How do you look at it so you don’t feel overwhelmed and give up? Well, you can look at failure as a part of a process. You look at it as ways that won’t work. You draw lessons from those ways. Then you let that go, focus on the present and try again (this time perhaps in a different way).

“The value of an idea lies in the using of it.”

Useful information is good. But you have to put it to use sometime or you’ll never reap any benefits or success. This is a pretty common problem when you for instance get interested in personal development. You get a lot of books, programs etc. and you study them. And then you get more.

“Being busy does not always mean real work. The object of all work is production or accomplishment and to either of these ends there must be forethought, system, planning, intelligence, and honest purpose, as well as perspiration. Seeming to do is not doing.”

Just going for it, taking action and doing something isn’t enough. You have to ask yourself if what you are doing is useful? Or is it just another way to keep yourself busy, to keep yourself from doing what you really want to do?

“Genius is one percent inspiration and ninety-nine percent perspiration.”

There is a myth that geniuses mostly just are geniuses and can do great things pretty much as easily as you and I tie our shoelaces. But what is seldom mentioned or seen is how much the really successful people work. And how far the people that just practice, practice, practice can go.

Everyone has some potential in them, to be successful is to understand your potential and put it into action. Not everyone can invent the light bulb, or run a 4 minute mile, or be a Navy Seal but everyone can take what God gave them and turn that into something special. Everyone has a gift, you just have to find it.

-Derived from Personal Development with The Positivity Blog by

Monday, December 10, 2007

Exporting African Experts for Remittance Revenue?


Let me start off by saying this is an extremely contradictory idea. The proposed suggestion is to support the emigration of experts in order to make money, so that Africa development programs can be started that require experts, we are exporting our experts to start programs that require experts. Sure, in the short term this may work, the burst of remittances from experts who have been offered support by Africa to enter developed countries will allow for the temporary increase in development programs. However, this is clearly a direct aid to the brain drain in Africa. Part of the reason Africa is having such a tough time is because of the lack of experts, so why don't we just ship off the experts we have left? No. Remittances are not even very effective now. A study by the World Bank showsthroughout Africa, “Financial and monetary policies and regulations have created barriers to the flow of remittances and their effective investment.” (Cerstin & Maimbo, 2003) The other issue with remittances is that it is determined on a country to country bases how those remittances will be passed back to Africa and many countries make it difficult for remittances to return to the hands which they were intended for. Africa has to built up from within in order to sustain long-lasting growth.

Economic development programs are however, very important to the growth of Africa. Remittances is not the wa
y to fund these programs. Relating to my previous essay, African countries have to start by providing the people with all of the basics needs and economic development programs would be the best way to do this. The question is if not remittances, where does Africa get the money for these programs? This is a very difficult question. Exporting African experts would provide the financial support in the short-term (possibly) but for sustainable growth this would be a disaster. I think the money has to come from many different places. Contrary to Professor Logan's belief, I believe that Africa has to take money from other countries in the form of aid. In the short term, aid and loans from financial institutions would be the most effective way of funding these economic development programs. The barrier that lies in the way is the African leadership. It is well documented the corruption of government officials especially when it comes to aid. It would be very important that the government officials are checked and balanced by other parts of the government, maybe even the AU. With “money-leaks” in the government aid and other money will never reach the people to provide economic development and basic needs.


Exporting African experts is definitely not the answer to economic development, the answer, however, is very hard to come by and may never be realized.


Sande, Cerstin, and Samuel M. Maimbo. "Migrant Labor Remittances in Africa." World Bank 64th ser. (2003): 1-3. 10 Dec. 2007 .


African Poverty and Debt

On a personal level, an individual has to be out of debt before they can begin to build wealth and grow financially, and a person in debt will always have a difficult time sustaining a comfortable life. However we are dealing with large, complicated countries and there is no one defined answer to whether poverty causes debt or debt causes poverty and even the relationship of the two can be confusing. The real answer to this is they both cause each other sometimes and sometimes debt has no effect on poverty and vice-a-verse, it all depends. In a country attempting to sustain life the real problem is poverty, debt is not even an issue when it comes to sustaining life (just look at the U.S.), debt would only be a bi-product of an attempt to bring a country out of poverty.


For many of the African countries, to come out of poverty quickly would mean an immediate increase in debt to other nations. However, a way not to come out of poverty quickly is to enforce Structural Adjustment Policies (SAPs). Basically these policies have been imposed to ensure debt repayment and economic restructuring. This is clearly a horrible idea for reducing poverty because to increase debt repayments spending on other things like healthcare, education and development all have to take a backseat to the debt-repayments, immediately increasing the poverty level of that country. (Shah, 2007)


Africa has so much going against them in the attempt to come out of poverty, everything from the brain drain, to civil wars, to degradation of the land, to disease and famine, Africa seems hopeless. The issue of debt vs. poverty is not in the hands of the country but in the hands of the people of Africa. Sure, the country can aid its people in rising out of poverty, but only the people can achieve this. My recommendation for eradicating poverty and later alleviating debt is to start with the people. The reason that many African countries cannot grow economically is because the people are suppressed by famine and disease. If you have to worry about what you are going to eat every night and you have 3 children suffering from HIV/AIDS I guarantee that you will have a difficult time furthering your education or your career. The solution is to first eradicate poverty and then repay debts. The enforcement of SAPs are a step in the wrong direction and only strains the finances of an already poor country. The answer is to first provide all the basic needs, clothing, healthcare, education, food, shelter, at a steady rate so the people can no longer worry about subsistence living and turn to industry and education to build up the country. It will not work the other way around. The people also need as much money as they can possibly obtain to pay for these basic needs day-in and day-out instead of the government imposing a tax to repay national debts. The best case scenario to eradicate poverty and eliminate debt would look something like this: African countries would begin by providing basic needs for all citizens on a daily basis (through increased spending and debt). The citizens then will have time to go out of the home to focus on industry and neoliberal development instead of subsistence living. This will create more exports and higher cash flow into the country. This higher cash flow will allow companies to grow and build wealth and to increase the salaries of their employees. The government will then be able to tax the citizens and businesses to repay national debts. Poverty must first be eradicated, even if it means going into debt, before debt is eliminated. The country must first get stronger then repay debt, the reason Africa is in debt is because of weak development, if the debt is repaid and development remains weak, Africa will return to debt in time. This is my attempt at a best case scenario, and we both know if the answer to the problem could be solved by an undergrad student at a US university, then the problem would already be fixed. I pray for the future of Africa.


Shah, Anup. "Structural Adjustment—a Major Cause of Poverty." Global Issues. 2 July 2007. 10 Dec. 2007 <http://www.globalissues.org/TradeRelated/SAP.asp>.